RobotAIGeek

FMR 300 vs Slamtec Phoebus P350

Flexiv vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

QUICK TAKE

  • FMR 300 offers the faster top speed (5.4 km/h vs 4.32 km/h).
  • Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
  • FMR 300 offers the larger battery (3.46 kWh vs 720 Wh).
  • Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the lighter build (105 kg vs 290 kg).

SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED

FMR 300Slamtec Phoebus P350
CompanyFlexivSlamtec
CategoryMobile-RobotsMobile-Robots
Price:Not announcedNot announced
Weight290 kg105 kg
Payload300 kg300 kg
Speed5.4 km/h4.32 km/h
Battery Life480 min720 min
Charging Time<=2 h (10-80%)2 hours from 30 to 80 percent
ConnectivityDual-band Wi-Fi 802.11ac with roaming, 2x Ethernet, CAN, 2x RS485—
Software / AI—Laser SLAM navigation with a deep-learning navigation system, optional visual SLAM, built-in push-to-map tool and a full API for business-logic development

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the difference between the FMR 300 and the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

FMR 300 is made by Flexiv, while Slamtec Phoebus P350 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which is faster, the FMR 300 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

The FMR 300 has the higher top speed at 5.4 km/h, compared to 4.32 km/h for the Slamtec Phoebus P350.

Which has the longer battery life, the FMR 300 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

The Slamtec Phoebus P350 has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the FMR 300.