RobotAIGeek

FMR 300 vs Slamtec Phoebus P350

Flexiv vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

快速总结

  • FMR 300 offers the faster top speed (5.4 km/h vs 4.32 km/h).
  • Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
  • FMR 300 offers the larger battery (3.46 kWh vs 720 Wh).
  • Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the lighter build (105 kg vs 290 kg).

规格对比

FMR 300Slamtec Phoebus P350
公司FlexivSlamtec
类别Mobile-RobotsMobile-Robots
价格:未公布未公布
重量290 kg105 kg
负载300 kg300 kg
速度5.4 km/h4.32 km/h
续航时间480 min720 min
充电时间<=2 h (10-80%)2 hours from 30 to 80 percent
连接方式Dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11ac with roaming, 2x Ethernet, CAN, 2x RS485—
软件 / AI—Laser SLAM navigation with a deep-learning navigation system, optional visual SLAM, built-in push-to-map tool and a full API for business-logic development

常见问题

What is the difference between the FMR 300 and the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

FMR 300 is made by Flexiv, while Slamtec Phoebus P350 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which is faster, the FMR 300 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

The FMR 300 has the higher top speed at 5.4 km/h, compared to 4.32 km/h for the Slamtec Phoebus P350.

Which has the longer battery life, the FMR 300 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

The Slamtec Phoebus P350 has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the FMR 300.