RobotAIGeek

FMR 300 vs Slamtec Phoebus P350

Flexiv vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

KURZFAZIT

  • FMR 300 offers the faster top speed (5.4 km/h vs 4.32 km/h).
  • Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
  • FMR 300 offers the larger battery (3.46 kWh vs 720 Wh).
  • Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the lighter build (105 kg vs 290 kg).

TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH

FMR 300Slamtec Phoebus P350
HerstellerFlexivSlamtec
KategorieMobile-RobotsMobile-Robots
Preis:Nicht angekündigtNicht angekündigt
Gewicht290 kg105 kg
Traglast300 kg300 kg
Geschwindigkeit5.4 km/h4.32 km/h
Akkulaufzeit480 min720 min
Ladezeit<=2 h (10-80%)2 hours from 30 to 80 percent
KonnektivitätDual-band Wi-Fi 802.11ac with roaming, 2x Ethernet, CAN, 2x RS485—
Software / KI—Laser SLAM navigation with a deep-learning navigation system, optional visual SLAM, built-in push-to-map tool and a full API for business-logic development

HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN

What is the difference between the FMR 300 and the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

FMR 300 is made by Flexiv, while Slamtec Phoebus P350 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which is faster, the FMR 300 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

The FMR 300 has the higher top speed at 5.4 km/h, compared to 4.32 km/h for the Slamtec Phoebus P350.

Which has the longer battery life, the FMR 300 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?

The Slamtec Phoebus P350 has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the FMR 300.