Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle vs SMAR M3-G
Bosch Rexroth vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the higher payload (260 kg vs 50 kg).
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the lighter build (88 kg vs 400 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle | SMAR M3-G | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Bosch Rexroth | Polaris3D |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 88 kg | 400 kg |
| Payload | 260 kg | 50 kg |
| Speed | 3.6 km/h | — |
| Battery Life | Lithium-ion 51.8 V / 29 Ah / 1,502 Wh | 2.66 kWh |
| Connectivity | WLAN; 10.1 inch touchscreen (1,280 x 800) | — |
| Software / AI | ACTIVE Shuttle Management System (AMS): order allocation, traffic management, live map, energy management; REST API, WebSocket and SocketIO in JSON | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle and the SMAR M3-G?
Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle is made by Bosch Rexroth, while SMAR M3-G is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the SMAR M3-G?
The Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle has the higher payload at 260 kg, compared to 50 kg for the SMAR M3-G.