Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle vs SMAR M3-G
Bosch Rexroth vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the higher payload (260 kg vs 50 kg).
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the lighter build (88 kg vs 400 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle | SMAR M3-G | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Bosch Rexroth | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 88 kg | 400 kg |
| Traglast | 260 kg | 50 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | Lithium-ion 51.8 V / 29 Ah / 1,502 Wh | 2.66 kWh |
| Konnektivität | WLAN; 10.1 inch touchscreen (1,280 x 800) | — |
| Software / KI | ACTIVE Shuttle Management System (AMS): order allocation, traffic management, live map, energy management; REST API, WebSocket and SocketIO in JSON | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle and the SMAR M3-G?
Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle is made by Bosch Rexroth, while SMAR M3-G is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the SMAR M3-G?
The Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle has the higher payload at 260 kg, compared to 50 kg for the SMAR M3-G.