Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle vs SMAR M3-G
Bosch Rexroth vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
クイックまとめ
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the higher payload (260 kg vs 50 kg).
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the lighter build (88 kg vs 400 kg).
スペック比較
| Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle | SMAR M3-G | |
|---|---|---|
| 企業 | Bosch Rexroth | Polaris3D |
| カテゴリー | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| 価格: | 未発表 | 未発表 |
| 重量 | 88 kg | 400 kg |
| 可搬重量 | 260 kg | 50 kg |
| 速度 | 3.6 km/h | — |
| バッテリー駆動時間 | Lithium-ion 51.8 V / 29 Ah / 1,502 Wh | 2.66 kWh |
| 接続性 | WLAN; 10.1 inch touchscreen (1,280 x 800) | — |
| ソフトウェア / AI | ACTIVE Shuttle Management System (AMS): order allocation, traffic management, live map, energy management; REST API, WebSocket and SocketIO in JSON | — |
購入ガイドと価格
よくある質問
What is the difference between the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle and the SMAR M3-G?
Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle is made by Bosch Rexroth, while SMAR M3-G is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the SMAR M3-G?
The Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle has the higher payload at 260 kg, compared to 50 kg for the SMAR M3-G.