Atrax vs aunav.NEO HD
Shark Robotics vs EM&E Group — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- aunav.NEO HD offers the higher payload (75 kg vs 50 kg).
- Atrax offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 300 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Atrax | aunav.NEO HD | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Shark Robotics | EM&E Group |
| Category | Military | Military |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2018 | — |
| Weight | 75 kg | — |
| Payload | 50 kg | 75 kg |
| Reach | 1.2 m | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 5 | — |
| Speed | — | 5 km/h |
| Battery Life | 360 min | 300 min |
| Connectivity | — | MN-MIMO COFDM radio, Wi-Fi, fibre optic, Ethernet; wired / wireless / EMCON modes |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Atrax and the aunav.NEO HD?
Atrax is made by Shark Robotics, while aunav.NEO HD is made by EM&E Group. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Atrax or the aunav.NEO HD?
The aunav.NEO HD has the higher payload at 75 kg, compared to 50 kg for the Atrax.
Which has the longer battery life, the Atrax or the aunav.NEO HD?
The Atrax has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 300 minutes for the aunav.NEO HD.