Atrax vs aunav.NEO HD
Shark Robotics vs EM&E Group — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
快速总结
- aunav.NEO HD offers the higher payload (75 kg vs 50 kg).
- Atrax offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 300 min).
规格对比
| Atrax | aunav.NEO HD | |
|---|---|---|
| 公司 | Shark Robotics | EM&E Group |
| 类别 | Military | Military |
| 价格： | 未公布 | 未公布 |
| 发布年份： | 2018 | — |
| 重量 | 75 kg | — |
| 负载 | 50 kg | 75 kg |
| 臂展 | 1.2 m | — |
| 自由度 | 5 | — |
| 速度 | — | 5 km/h |
| 续航时间 | 360 min | 300 min |
| 连接方式 | — | MN-MIMO COFDM radio, Wi-Fi, fibre optic, Ethernet; wired / wireless / EMCON modes |
选购指南与价格
常见问题
What is the difference between the Atrax and the aunav.NEO HD?
Atrax is made by Shark Robotics, while aunav.NEO HD is made by EM&E Group. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Atrax or the aunav.NEO HD?
The aunav.NEO HD has the higher payload at 75 kg, compared to 50 kg for the Atrax.
Which has the longer battery life, the Atrax or the aunav.NEO HD?
The Atrax has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 300 minutes for the aunav.NEO HD.