Atrax vs aunav.NEXT
Shark Robotics vs EM&E Group — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- aunav.NEXT offers the higher payload (250 kg vs 50 kg).
- Atrax offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 300 min).
- aunav.NEXT offers the longer reach (2.07 m vs 1.2 m).
- aunav.NEXT offers the more degrees of freedom (8 vs 5).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Atrax | aunav.NEXT | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Shark Robotics | EM&E Group |
| Category | Military | Military |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2018 | — |
| Weight | 75 kg | — |
| Payload | 50 kg | 250 kg |
| Reach | 1.2 m | 2.07 m |
| Degrees of Freedom | 5 | 8 |
| Speed | — | 4 km/h |
| Battery Life | 360 min | 300 min |
| Connectivity | — | COFDM radio, Bluetooth, fibre optic |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Atrax and the aunav.NEXT?
Atrax is made by Shark Robotics, while aunav.NEXT is made by EM&E Group. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Atrax or the aunav.NEXT?
The aunav.NEXT has the higher payload at 250 kg, compared to 50 kg for the Atrax.
Which has the longer battery life, the Atrax or the aunav.NEXT?
The Atrax has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 300 minutes for the aunav.NEXT.