Atrax vs aunav.CID Light
Shark Robotics vs EM&E Group — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- aunav.CID Light offers the higher payload (400 kg vs 50 kg).
- aunav.CID Light offers the longer reach (8.5 m vs 1.2 m).
- aunav.CID Light offers the more degrees of freedom (8 vs 5).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Atrax | aunav.CID Light | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Shark Robotics | EM&E Group |
| Category | Military | Military |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2018 | — |
| Weight | 75 kg | — |
| Payload | 50 kg | 400 kg |
| Reach | 1.2 m | 8.5 m |
| Degrees of Freedom | 5 | 8 |
| Battery Life | 360 min | — |
| Connectivity | — | Ethernet, COFDM radio, Wi-Fi, fibre optic |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Atrax and the aunav.CID Light?
Atrax is made by Shark Robotics, while aunav.CID Light is made by EM&E Group. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Atrax or the aunav.CID Light?
The aunav.CID Light has the higher payload at 400 kg, compared to 50 kg for the Atrax.