AICO 2-4 vs Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis)
Flexiv vs Kinova — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- AICO 2-4 offers the higher payload (8 kg vs 4 kg).
- Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis) offers the longer reach (891 mm vs 780 mm).
- AICO 2-4 offers the more degrees of freedom (14 vs 6).
- Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis) offers the lighter build (7.2 kg vs 281 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| AICO 2-4 | Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis) | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Flexiv | Kinova |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Robotic-Arms |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 281 kg | 7.2 kg |
| Payload | 8 kg | 4 kg |
| Reach | 780 mm | 891 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 14 | 6 |
| Speed | — | 1.8 km/h |
| Battery Life | 360 min | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the AICO 2-4 and the Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis)?
AICO 2-4 is made by Flexiv, while Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis) is made by Kinova. AICO 2-4 is a mobile-robots, while Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis) is a robotic-arms.
Which has the higher payload, the AICO 2-4 or the Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis)?
The AICO 2-4 has the higher payload at 8 kg, compared to 4 kg for the Kinova Gen3 robotic arm (6-axis).