Sky-Watch RQ-70 Dainn vs TEKEVER AR5
Sky-Watch vs TEKEVER — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- TEKEVER AR5 offers the longer runtime (1,200 min vs 480 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Sky-Watch RQ-70 Dainn | TEKEVER AR5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Sky-Watch | TEKEVER |
| Category | Military | Military |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | — | 2018 |
| Weight | 9.2 kg | — |
| Payload | — | 50 kg |
| Speed | — | 100.08 km/h |
| Battery Life | 480 min | 1,200 min |
| Connectivity | ATAK, DELTA, SitaWare and other C4I systems; STANAG 2934 | SATCOM beyond line of sight |
| Software / AI | Sky-Watch Mission Software; shared Ground Control Station | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Sky-Watch RQ-70 Dainn and the TEKEVER AR5?
Sky-Watch RQ-70 Dainn is made by Sky-Watch, while TEKEVER AR5 is made by TEKEVER. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the Sky-Watch RQ-70 Dainn or the TEKEVER AR5?
The TEKEVER AR5 has the higher runtime at about 1,200 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the Sky-Watch RQ-70 Dainn.