RobotAIGeek

ROBO Rook vs Unit Load Carrier AMR

Nakanishi Metal Works (NKC) vs Hachidori Robotics — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

QUICK TAKE

  • Unit Load Carrier AMR offers the higher payload (1,300 kg vs 1,000 kg).
  • Unit Load Carrier AMR offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).

SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED

ROBO RookUnit Load Carrier AMR
CompanyNakanishi Metal Works (NKC)Hachidori Robotics
CategoryIndustrial-RobotMobile-Robots
Price:Not announcedNot announced
Weight260 kg—
Payload1,000 kg1,300 kg
Speed3.6 km/h7.2 km/h
Battery Life240 min48 V 12 Ah (HU200) / 48 V 27 Ah (HU500, HU1300), swappable LiFePO4
ConnectivityWi-Fi IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n; Bluetooth 4.0+EDR/LR (manual)VDA 5050; WMS/ERP API integration
Software / AIPLC sequence controlHachidori fleet monitoring dashboard; WiNN navigation

Buying guides and prices

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the difference between the ROBO Rook and the Unit Load Carrier AMR?

ROBO Rook is made by Nakanishi Metal Works (NKC), while Unit Load Carrier AMR is made by Hachidori Robotics. ROBO Rook is a industrial-robot, while Unit Load Carrier AMR is a mobile-robots.

Which has the higher payload, the ROBO Rook or the Unit Load Carrier AMR?

The Unit Load Carrier AMR has the higher payload at 1,300 kg, compared to 1,000 kg for the ROBO Rook.

Which is faster, the ROBO Rook or the Unit Load Carrier AMR?

The Unit Load Carrier AMR has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the ROBO Rook.