RcDC vs RULO Pro
Amano vs Panasonic — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- RULO Pro offers the longer runtime (150 min vs 120 min).
- RULO Pro offers the lighter build (26 kg vs 30 kg).
- RULO Pro is the newer platform (2,018 vs 2,015).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| RcDC | RULO Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Amano | Panasonic |
| Category | Cleaning-Robots | Cleaning-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2015 | 2018 |
| Weight | 30 kg | 26 kg |
| Speed | 2.3 km/h | — |
| Battery Life | 120 min | 150 min |
| Charging Time | About 4 hours | About 6 hours |
| Connectivity | Wireless link to a tablet | LTE (e-mail notifications of start, finish and error stops, with a cleaned-area map) |
| Software / AI | Tablet app for setting cleaning areas, editing obstacles and monitoring completed areas | SLAM navigation; tablet-based area selection; automatic map creation on MC-GRS2M |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the RcDC and the RULO Pro?
RcDC is made by Amano, while RULO Pro is made by Panasonic. Both are cleaning-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the RcDC or the RULO Pro?
The RULO Pro has the higher runtime at about 150 minutes, compared to about 120 minutes for the RcDC.