MORK vs Slamtec Apollo 2.0
Indy Associates vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- MORK offers the faster top speed (5.04 km/h vs 4.32 km/h).
- Slamtec Apollo 2.0 offers the longer runtime (960 min vs 420 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| MORK | Slamtec Apollo 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Indy Associates | Slamtec |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2016 | — |
| Weight | — | 40 kg |
| Payload | — | 80 kg |
| Speed | 5.04 km/h | 4.32 km/h |
| Battery Life | 420 min | 960 min |
| Connectivity | Internet (remote operation) | — |
| Software / AI | — | SLAMWARE 3.0 autonomous localisation and navigation with multi-sensor data fusion; multi-robot scheduling; elevator and door control |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the MORK and the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
MORK is made by Indy Associates, while Slamtec Apollo 2.0 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is faster, the MORK or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The MORK has the higher top speed at 5.04 km/h, compared to 4.32 km/h for the Slamtec Apollo 2.0.
Which has the longer battery life, the MORK or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The Slamtec Apollo 2.0 has the higher runtime at about 960 minutes, compared to about 420 minutes for the MORK.