Magazino SOTO vs SMAR M3-C
Magazino vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 50 kg).
- SMAR M3-C offers the lighter build (400 kg vs 695 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Magazino SOTO | SMAR M3-C | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Magazino | Polaris3D |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 695 kg | 400 kg |
| Payload | 240 kg | 50 kg |
| Reach | 1.7 m | — |
| Speed | 1.5 km/h | — |
| Battery Life | 480 min | 2.66 kWh |
| Connectivity | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | — |
| Software / AI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the SMAR M3-C?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while SMAR M3-C is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-C?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 50 kg for the SMAR M3-C.