Magazino SOTO vs MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW
Magazino vs WObit — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 200 kg).
- MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW offers the faster top speed (3.49 km/h vs 1.5 km/h).
- MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW offers the lighter build (150 kg vs 695 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Magazino SOTO | MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Magazino | WObit |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 695 kg | 150 kg |
| Payload | 240 kg | 200 kg |
| Reach | 1.7 m | — |
| Speed | 1.5 km/h | 3.49 km/h |
| Battery Life | 480 min | 480 min |
| Connectivity | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; MOBOT RoutePlanner |
| Software / AI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW is made by WObit. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 200 kg for the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW.
Which is faster, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW?
The MOBOT AGV CubeRunner MW has the higher top speed at 3.49 km/h, compared to 1.5 km/h for the Magazino SOTO.