Magazino SOTO vs MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2
Magazino vs WObit — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 200 kg).
- MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2 offers the faster top speed (2.99 km/h vs 1.5 km/h).
- MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2 offers the lighter build (220 kg vs 695 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Magazino SOTO | MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Magazino | WObit |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 695 kg | 220 kg |
| Payload | 240 kg | 200 kg |
| Reach | 1.7 m | — |
| Speed | 1.5 km/h | 2.99 km/h |
| Battery Life | 480 min | 480 min |
| Connectivity | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; MOBOT RoutePlanner |
| Software / AI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2 is made by WObit. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 200 kg for the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2.
Which is faster, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2?
The MOBOT AGV CubeRunner 2 has the higher top speed at 2.99 km/h, compared to 1.5 km/h for the Magazino SOTO.