iPal 2.0 vs Miko 3
AvatarMind vs Miko — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- iPal 2.0 offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 420 min).
- Miko 3 offers the lighter build (0.9 kg vs 12.5 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| iPal 2.0 | Miko 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AvatarMind | Miko |
| Category | Consumer-Robot | Consumer-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | $299 |
| Weight | 12.5 kg | 0.9 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 14 | — |
| Battery Life | 480 min | 420 min |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 2.4/5.8 GHz, Bluetooth 4.2, USB OTG | Wi-Fi; Miko Parent app |
| Software / AI | — | Deep-learning conversational AI; Miko Max content subscription |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the iPal 2.0 and the Miko 3?
iPal 2.0 is made by AvatarMind, while Miko 3 is made by Miko. Both are consumer-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is cheaper, the iPal 2.0 or the Miko 3?
The Miko 3 is listed at $299; pricing for the iPal 2.0 has not been publicly announced.
Which has the longer battery life, the iPal 2.0 or the Miko 3?
The iPal 2.0 has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 420 minutes for the Miko 3.