FP 3 vs Shark 400
AFORMIC vs OKAGV — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Shark 400 offers the higher payload (400 kg vs 300 kg).
- FP 3 offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 4.2 km/h).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| FP 3 | Shark 400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AFORMIC | OKAGV |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 200 kg | — |
| Payload | 300 kg | 400 kg |
| Speed | 7.2 km/h | 4.2 km/h |
| Battery Life | Li-Ion 51 Ah, 48 V | DC 48 V lithium |
| Connectivity | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | Wireless communication |
| Software / AI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the FP 3 and the Shark 400?
FP 3 is made by AFORMIC, while Shark 400 is made by OKAGV. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FP 3 or the Shark 400?
The Shark 400 has the higher payload at 400 kg, compared to 300 kg for the FP 3.
Which is faster, the FP 3 or the Shark 400?
The FP 3 has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 4.2 km/h for the Shark 400.