FP 13 vs VTA30/50
AFORMIC vs i-Cow — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- VTA30/50 offers the higher payload (3,000 kg vs 2,000 kg).
- VTA30/50 offers the faster top speed (5.4 km/h vs 5.04 km/h).
- VTA30/50 offers the lighter build (900 kg vs 1,100 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| FP 13 | VTA30/50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AFORMIC | i-Cow |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 1,100 kg | 900 kg |
| Payload | 2,000 kg | 3,000 kg |
| Speed | 5.04 km/h | 5.4 km/h |
| Battery Life | Li-Ion 240 Ah, 48 V | — |
| Connectivity | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | Fleet scheduling system; VDA 5050 |
| Software / AI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the FP 13 and the VTA30/50?
FP 13 is made by AFORMIC, while VTA30/50 is made by i-Cow. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FP 13 or the VTA30/50?
The VTA30/50 has the higher payload at 3,000 kg, compared to 2,000 kg for the FP 13.
Which is faster, the FP 13 or the VTA30/50?
The VTA30/50 has the higher top speed at 5.4 km/h, compared to 5.04 km/h for the FP 13.