EROLLER 3 vs FP 3
Oppent vs AFORMIC — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- FP 3 offers the higher payload (300 kg vs 240 kg).
- FP 3 offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).
- FP 3 offers the lighter build (200 kg vs 270 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| EROLLER 3 | FP 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Oppent | AFORMIC |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 270 kg | 200 kg |
| Payload | 240 kg | 300 kg |
| Speed | 3.6 km/h | 7.2 km/h |
| Battery Life | 360 min | Li-Ion 51 Ah, 48 V |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n (2.4/5 GHz) | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager |
| Software / AI | — | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the EROLLER 3 and the FP 3?
EROLLER 3 is made by Oppent, while FP 3 is made by AFORMIC. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the EROLLER 3 or the FP 3?
The FP 3 has the higher payload at 300 kg, compared to 240 kg for the EROLLER 3.
Which is faster, the EROLLER 3 or the FP 3?
The FP 3 has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the EROLLER 3.