cocobo vs Digital Teammate
SECOM vs Badger Technologies — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Digital Teammate offers the longer runtime (960 min vs 180 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| cocobo | Digital Teammate | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | SECOM | Badger Technologies |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2022 | — |
| Weight | 135 kg | — |
| Speed | 6 km/h | — |
| Battery Life | 180 min | 960 min |
| Connectivity | 5G, LTE, Wi-Fi | Sends scan data to Badger's cloud analytics platform |
| Software / AI | AI detection; monitoring console PC; cloud integration (elevators, building systems) | Upgradeable ROS-based firmware; Badger cloud analytics, dashboards and mobile app |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the cocobo and the Digital Teammate?
cocobo is made by SECOM, while Digital Teammate is made by Badger Technologies. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the cocobo or the Digital Teammate?
The Digital Teammate has the higher runtime at about 960 minutes, compared to about 180 minutes for the cocobo.