CLINABO vs RcDC
Nippon Signal vs Amano — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- CLINABO offers the longer runtime (180 min vs 120 min).
- RcDC offers the lighter build (30 kg vs 220 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| CLINABO | RcDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Nippon Signal | Amano |
| Category | Cleaning-Robots | Cleaning-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | — | 2015 |
| Weight | 220 kg | 30 kg |
| Speed | — | 2.3 km/h |
| Battery Life | 180 min | 120 min |
| Charging Time | — | About 4 hours |
| Connectivity | — | Wireless link to a tablet |
| Software / AI | Automatic map and route generation | Tablet app for setting cleaning areas, editing obstacles and monitoring completed areas |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the CLINABO and the RcDC?
CLINABO is made by Nippon Signal, while RcDC is made by Amano. Both are cleaning-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the CLINABO or the RcDC?
The CLINABO has the higher runtime at about 180 minutes, compared to about 120 minutes for the RcDC.