aunav.NEO HD vs Throwbot 2
EM&E Group vs ReconRobotics — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- aunav.NEO HD offers the faster top speed (5 km/h vs 2.16 km/h).
- aunav.NEO HD offers the longer runtime (300 min vs 110 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| aunav.NEO HD | Throwbot 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | EM&E Group | ReconRobotics |
| Category | Military | Military |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | — | 0.6 kg |
| Payload | 75 kg | — |
| Speed | 5 km/h | 2.16 km/h |
| Battery Life | 300 min | 110 min |
| Connectivity | MN-MIMO COFDM radio, Wi-Fi, fibre optic, Ethernet; wired / wireless / EMCON modes | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the aunav.NEO HD and the Throwbot 2?
aunav.NEO HD is made by EM&E Group, while Throwbot 2 is made by ReconRobotics. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is faster, the aunav.NEO HD or the Throwbot 2?
The aunav.NEO HD has the higher top speed at 5 km/h, compared to 2.16 km/h for the Throwbot 2.
Which has the longer battery life, the aunav.NEO HD or the Throwbot 2?
The aunav.NEO HD has the higher runtime at about 300 minutes, compared to about 110 minutes for the Throwbot 2.