aunav.NEO HD vs Robotic Target Complex
EM&E Group vs Gumich RTK — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Robotic Target Complex offers the faster top speed (10.01 km/h vs 5 km/h).
- aunav.NEO HD offers the longer runtime (300 min vs 120 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| aunav.NEO HD | Robotic Target Complex | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | EM&E Group | Gumich RTK |
| Category | Military | Military |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | — | 280 kg |
| Payload | 75 kg | — |
| Speed | 5 km/h | 10.01 km/h |
| Battery Life | 300 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | MN-MIMO COFDM radio, Wi-Fi, fibre optic, Ethernet; wired / wireless / EMCON modes | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the aunav.NEO HD and the Robotic Target Complex?
aunav.NEO HD is made by EM&E Group, while Robotic Target Complex is made by Gumich RTK. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is faster, the aunav.NEO HD or the Robotic Target Complex?
The Robotic Target Complex has the higher top speed at 10.01 km/h, compared to 5 km/h for the aunav.NEO HD.
Which has the longer battery life, the aunav.NEO HD or the Robotic Target Complex?
The aunav.NEO HD has the higher runtime at about 300 minutes, compared to about 120 minutes for the Robotic Target Complex.