AspinaAMR300L vs C040 CE
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Zhejiang HuaRay Technology — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- C040 CE offers the higher payload (400 kg vs 300 kg).
- C040 CE offers the faster top speed (5.4 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).
- AspinaAMR300L offers the longer runtime (570 min vs 318 min).
- C040 CE offers the lighter build (110 kg vs 155 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| AspinaAMR300L | C040 CE | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Zhejiang HuaRay Technology |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 155 kg | 110 kg |
| Payload | 300 kg | 400 kg |
| Speed | 3.6 km/h | 5.4 km/h |
| Battery Life | 570 min | 318 min |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 8-ch I/O; PLC/API | WiFi |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR300L and the C040 CE?
AspinaAMR300L is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while C040 CE is made by Zhejiang HuaRay Technology. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR300L or the C040 CE?
The C040 CE has the higher payload at 400 kg, compared to 300 kg for the AspinaAMR300L.
Which is faster, the AspinaAMR300L or the C040 CE?
The C040 CE has the higher top speed at 5.4 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the AspinaAMR300L.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR300L or the C040 CE?
The AspinaAMR300L has the higher runtime at about 570 minutes, compared to about 318 minutes for the C040 CE.