AMR-160 vs Slamtec Phoebus P350
GE Creative vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- AMR-160 offers the higher payload (500 kg vs 300 kg).
- Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the faster top speed (4.32 km/h vs 3 km/h).
- Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 300 min).
- Slamtec Phoebus P350 offers the lighter build (105 kg vs 130 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| AMR-160 | Slamtec Phoebus P350 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | GE Creative | Slamtec |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 130 kg | 105 kg |
| Payload | 500 kg | 300 kg |
| Speed | 3 km/h | 4.32 km/h |
| Battery Life | 300 min | 720 min |
| Charging Time | — | 2 hours from 30 to 80 percent |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; Bluetooth remote control; Web UI | — |
| Software / AI | — | Laser SLAM navigation with a deep-learning navigation system, optional visual SLAM, built-in push-to-map tool and a full API for business-logic development |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the AMR-160 and the Slamtec Phoebus P350?
AMR-160 is made by GE Creative, while Slamtec Phoebus P350 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AMR-160 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?
The AMR-160 has the higher payload at 500 kg, compared to 300 kg for the Slamtec Phoebus P350.
Which is faster, the AMR-160 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?
The Slamtec Phoebus P350 has the higher top speed at 4.32 km/h, compared to 3 km/h for the AMR-160.
Which has the longer battery life, the AMR-160 or the Slamtec Phoebus P350?
The Slamtec Phoebus P350 has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 300 minutes for the AMR-160.