Perceptyne PR-UNO vs PreciseFlex 3400
Perceptyne vs Brooks Automation — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the higher payload (5 kg vs 3 kg).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the longer reach (800 mm vs 588 mm).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the more degrees of freedom (7 vs 4).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the lighter build (18.5 kg vs 25 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Perceptyne PR-UNO | PreciseFlex 3400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Perceptyne | Brooks Automation |
| Kategorie | Collaborative-Robot | Collaborative-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 18.5 kg | 25 kg |
| Traglast | 5 kg | 3 kg |
| Reichweite | 800 mm | 588 mm |
| Freiheitsgrade | 7 | 4 |
| Konnektivität | — | 100 Mb Ethernet; Modbus/TCP; RS232; 12 DI / 8 DO |
| Software / KI | Native Physical Intelligence (PhI) layer; runs open-source models; VR teleoperation (Pico4) | Guidance Development Studio; GPL; TCS API |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Perceptyne PR-UNO and the PreciseFlex 3400?
Perceptyne PR-UNO is made by Perceptyne, while PreciseFlex 3400 is made by Brooks Automation. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Perceptyne PR-UNO or the PreciseFlex 3400?
The Perceptyne PR-UNO has the higher payload at 5 kg, compared to 3 kg for the PreciseFlex 3400.