Perceptyne PR-UNO vs PreciseFlex 3400
Perceptyne vs Brooks Automation — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the higher payload (5 kg vs 3 kg).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the longer reach (800 mm vs 588 mm).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the more degrees of freedom (7 vs 4).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the lighter build (18.5 kg vs 25 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Perceptyne PR-UNO | PreciseFlex 3400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Perceptyne | Brooks Automation |
| Category | Collaborative-Robot | Collaborative-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 18.5 kg | 25 kg |
| Payload | 5 kg | 3 kg |
| Reach | 800 mm | 588 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 7 | 4 |
| Connectivity | — | 100 Mb Ethernet; Modbus/TCP; RS232; 12 DI / 8 DO |
| Software / AI | Native Physical Intelligence (PhI) layer; runs open-source models; VR teleoperation (Pico4) | Guidance Development Studio; GPL; TCS API |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Perceptyne PR-UNO and the PreciseFlex 3400?
Perceptyne PR-UNO is made by Perceptyne, while PreciseFlex 3400 is made by Brooks Automation. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Perceptyne PR-UNO or the PreciseFlex 3400?
The Perceptyne PR-UNO has the higher payload at 5 kg, compared to 3 kg for the PreciseFlex 3400.