RobotAIGeek

Perceptyne PR-UNO vs PreciseFlex 3400

Perceptyne vs Brooks Automation — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

快速總結

  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the higher payload (5 kg vs 3 kg).
  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the longer reach (800 mm vs 588 mm).
  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the more degrees of freedom (7 vs 4).
  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the lighter build (18.5 kg vs 25 kg).

規格對比

Perceptyne PR-UNOPreciseFlex 3400
公司PerceptyneBrooks Automation
類別Collaborative-RobotCollaborative-Robot
價格:尚未公布尚未公布
重量18.5 kg25 kg
負載5 kg3 kg
臂展800 mm588 mm
自由度74
連線方式—100 Mb Ethernet; Modbus/TCP; RS232; 12 DI / 8 DO
軟體 / AINative Physical Intelligence (PhI) layer; runs open-source models; VR teleoperation (Pico4)Guidance Development Studio; GPL; TCS API

選購指南與價格

常見問題

What is the difference between the Perceptyne PR-UNO and the PreciseFlex 3400?

Perceptyne PR-UNO is made by Perceptyne, while PreciseFlex 3400 is made by Brooks Automation. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which has the higher payload, the Perceptyne PR-UNO or the PreciseFlex 3400?

The Perceptyne PR-UNO has the higher payload at 5 kg, compared to 3 kg for the PreciseFlex 3400.