SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series) vs Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type
Ottobock (SuitX) vs Cyberdyne Inc. — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series)
Ottobock (SuitX)
Not announced
Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type
Cyberdyne Inc.
Not announced
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series) | Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Ottobock (SuitX) | Cyberdyne Inc. |
| Category | Exosuit | Exosuit |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | — | 2019 |
| Weight | ~3 – 8 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Payload | — | 1.5 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | — | 1 |
| Battery Life | 4 – 8 hours (powered versions) | 120 min |
| Charging Time | ~2 hours (powered versions) | — |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth monitoring (some models) | — |
| Software / AI | Ottobock/SuitX ergonomic monitoring tools | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series) and the Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type?
SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series) is made by Ottobock (SuitX), while Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type is made by Cyberdyne Inc.. Both are exosuits, so the differences come down to price and specifications.