SCRUBBER 50 vs Slamtec Apollo 2.0
Gaussian Robotics vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- SCRUBBER 50 offers the higher payload (150 kg vs 80 kg).
- Slamtec Apollo 2.0 offers the faster top speed (4.32 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).
- Slamtec Apollo 2.0 offers the longer runtime (960 min vs 180 min).
- Slamtec Apollo 2.0 offers the lighter build (40 kg vs 150 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| SCRUBBER 50 | Slamtec Apollo 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Gaussian Robotics | Slamtec |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2018 | — |
| Weight | 150 kg | 40 kg |
| Payload | 150 kg | 80 kg |
| Speed | 3.6 km/h | 4.32 km/h |
| Battery Life | 180 min | 960 min |
| Software / AI | — | SLAMWARE 3.0 autonomous localisation and navigation with multi-sensor data fusion; multi-robot scheduling; elevator and door control |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the SCRUBBER 50 and the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
SCRUBBER 50 is made by Gaussian Robotics, while Slamtec Apollo 2.0 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the SCRUBBER 50 or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The SCRUBBER 50 has the higher payload at 150 kg, compared to 80 kg for the Slamtec Apollo 2.0.
Which is faster, the SCRUBBER 50 or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The Slamtec Apollo 2.0 has the higher top speed at 4.32 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the SCRUBBER 50.
Which has the longer battery life, the SCRUBBER 50 or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The Slamtec Apollo 2.0 has the higher runtime at about 960 minutes, compared to about 180 minutes for the SCRUBBER 50.