RB-130 vs Slamtec Apollo 2.0
Robotise vs Slamtec — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- RB-130 offers the higher payload (130 kg vs 80 kg).
- Slamtec Apollo 2.0 offers the longer runtime (960 min vs 480 min).
- RB-130 offers the larger battery (1 kWh vs 706 Wh).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| RB-130 | Slamtec Apollo 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Robotise | Slamtec |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | — | 40 kg |
| Payload | 130 kg | 80 kg |
| Speed | — | 4.32 km/h |
| Battery Life | 480 min | 960 min |
| Software / AI | — | SLAMWARE 3.0 autonomous localisation and navigation with multi-sensor data fusion; multi-robot scheduling; elevator and door control |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the RB-130 and the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
RB-130 is made by Robotise, while Slamtec Apollo 2.0 is made by Slamtec. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the RB-130 or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The RB-130 has the higher payload at 130 kg, compared to 80 kg for the Slamtec Apollo 2.0.
Which has the longer battery life, the RB-130 or the Slamtec Apollo 2.0?
The Slamtec Apollo 2.0 has the higher runtime at about 960 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the RB-130.