Perceptyne PR-UNO vs PreciseFlex c5
Perceptyne vs Brooks Automation — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the longer reach (800 mm vs 721 mm).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the more degrees of freedom (7 vs 4).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the lighter build (18.5 kg vs 28.8 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Perceptyne PR-UNO | PreciseFlex c5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Perceptyne | Brooks Automation |
| Category | Collaborative-Robot | Collaborative-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 18.5 kg | 28.8 kg |
| Payload | 5 kg | 5 kg |
| Reach | 800 mm | 721 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 7 | 4 |
| Connectivity | — | EtherNet/IP; Modbus/TCP; RS232; 12 DI / 8 DO |
| Software / AI | Native Physical Intelligence (PhI) layer; runs open-source models; VR teleoperation (Pico4) | Guidance Development Studio; GPL; TCS API |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Perceptyne PR-UNO and the PreciseFlex c5?
Perceptyne PR-UNO is made by Perceptyne, while PreciseFlex c5 is made by Brooks Automation. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.