RobotAIGeek

Perceptyne PR-UNO vs PreciseFlex 400

Perceptyne vs Brooks Automation — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

QUICK TAKE

  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the higher payload (5 kg vs 0.5 kg).
  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the longer reach (800 mm vs 656 mm).
  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the more degrees of freedom (7 vs 4).
  • Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the lighter build (18.5 kg vs 20 kg).

SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED

Perceptyne PR-UNOPreciseFlex 400
CompanyPerceptyneBrooks Automation
CategoryCollaborative-RobotCollaborative-Robot
Price:Not announcedNot announced
Weight18.5 kg20 kg
Payload5 kg0.5 kg
Reach800 mm656 mm
Degrees of Freedom74
Connectivity—100 Mb Ethernet; Modbus/TCP; RS232; 8 DI / 8 DO
Software / AINative Physical Intelligence (PhI) layer; runs open-source models; VR teleoperation (Pico4)Guidance Development Studio; GPL; TCS API; GP Flow

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the difference between the Perceptyne PR-UNO and the PreciseFlex 400?

Perceptyne PR-UNO is made by Perceptyne, while PreciseFlex 400 is made by Brooks Automation. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which has the higher payload, the Perceptyne PR-UNO or the PreciseFlex 400?

The Perceptyne PR-UNO has the higher payload at 5 kg, compared to 0.5 kg for the PreciseFlex 400.