MICO vs Perceptyne PR-UNO
Flexiv vs Perceptyne — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- MICO offers the higher payload (10 kg vs 5 kg).
- Perceptyne PR-UNO offers the longer reach (800 mm vs 752 mm).
- MICO offers the more degrees of freedom (14 vs 7).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| MICO | Perceptyne PR-UNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Flexiv | Perceptyne |
| Category | Collaborative-Robot | Collaborative-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | — | 18.5 kg |
| Payload | 10 kg | 5 kg |
| Reach | 752 mm | 800 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 14 | 7 |
| Software / AI | Flexiv RDK (1 kHz real-time and non-real-time control); Elements | Native Physical Intelligence (PhI) layer; runs open-source models; VR teleoperation (Pico4) |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the MICO and the Perceptyne PR-UNO?
MICO is made by Flexiv, while Perceptyne PR-UNO is made by Perceptyne. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the MICO or the Perceptyne PR-UNO?
The MICO has the higher payload at 10 kg, compared to 5 kg for the Perceptyne PR-UNO.