MICO vs Neuromeka Indy12 V3
Flexiv vs Neuromeka — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Neuromeka Indy12 V3 offers the higher payload (12 kg vs 10 kg).
- Neuromeka Indy12 V3 offers the longer reach (1.7 m vs 752 mm).
- MICO offers the more degrees of freedom (14 vs 6).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| MICO | Neuromeka Indy12 V3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Flexiv | Neuromeka |
| Category | Collaborative-Robot | Collaborative-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | — | 57 kg |
| Payload | 10 kg | 12 kg |
| Reach | 752 mm | 1.7 m |
| Degrees of Freedom | 14 | 6 |
| Speed | — | 1 km/h |
| Connectivity | — | Sensorless collision detection and impedance control; direct teaching; online and offline programming from the CONTY tablet teach-pendant app; IndyCARE remote management |
| Software / AI | Flexiv RDK (1 kHz real-time and non-real-time control); Elements | — |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the MICO and the Neuromeka Indy12 V3?
MICO is made by Flexiv, while Neuromeka Indy12 V3 is made by Neuromeka. Both are collaborative-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the MICO or the Neuromeka Indy12 V3?
The Neuromeka Indy12 V3 has the higher payload at 12 kg, compared to 10 kg for the MICO.