Husky A300 vs TALON
Clearpath Robotics (Open Robotics) vs QinetiQ (Foster-Miller) — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- Husky A300 offers the higher payload (100 kg vs 68 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Husky A300 | TALON | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Clearpath Robotics (Open Robotics) | QinetiQ (Foster-Miller) |
| Category | Ground | Ground |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | — | 2000 |
| Weight | 50 kg | 76.2 kg |
| Payload | 100 kg | 68 kg |
| Reach | — | 1.95 m |
| Speed | — | 8.2 km/h |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | 240 min |
| Charging Time | ~3 hours | — |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet | Encrypted IP mesh radio (Persistent Systems MPU5), Gigabit Ethernet backbone, line-of-sight range over 800 m |
| Software / AI | ROS 2 + OutdoorNav + SDK | Laptop Control Unit |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Husky A300 and the TALON?
Husky A300 is made by Clearpath Robotics (Open Robotics), while TALON is made by QinetiQ (Foster-Miller). Both are grounds, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Husky A300 or the TALON?
The Husky A300 has the higher payload at 100 kg, compared to 68 kg for the TALON.