FP 3 vs VLC50
AFORMIC vs i-Cow — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- VLC50 offers the higher payload (5,000 kg vs 300 kg).
- FP 3 offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 5.4 km/h).
- FP 3 offers the lighter build (200 kg vs 7,850 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| FP 3 | VLC50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AFORMIC | i-Cow |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 200 kg | 7,850 kg |
| Payload | 300 kg | 5,000 kg |
| Speed | 7.2 km/h | 5.4 km/h |
| Battery Life | Li-Ion 51 Ah, 48 V | — |
| Connectivity | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | Fleet scheduling system; VDA 5050 |
| Software / AI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the FP 3 and the VLC50?
FP 3 is made by AFORMIC, while VLC50 is made by i-Cow. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FP 3 or the VLC50?
The VLC50 has the higher payload at 5,000 kg, compared to 300 kg for the FP 3.
Which is faster, the FP 3 or the VLC50?
The FP 3 has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 5.4 km/h for the VLC50.