FP 13 vs U3200AR
AFORMIC vs Asseco CEIT — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- U3200AR offers the higher payload (3,000 kg vs 2,000 kg).
- U3200AR offers the faster top speed (5.4 km/h vs 5.04 km/h).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| FP 13 | U3200AR | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AFORMIC | Asseco CEIT |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 1,100 kg | — |
| Payload | 2,000 kg | 3,000 kg |
| Speed | 5.04 km/h | 5.4 km/h |
| Battery Life | Li-Ion 240 Ah, 48 V | — |
| Connectivity | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | 5G-compatible |
| Software / AI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the FP 13 and the U3200AR?
FP 13 is made by AFORMIC, while U3200AR is made by Asseco CEIT. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FP 13 or the U3200AR?
The U3200AR has the higher payload at 3,000 kg, compared to 2,000 kg for the FP 13.
Which is faster, the FP 13 or the U3200AR?
The U3200AR has the higher top speed at 5.4 km/h, compared to 5.04 km/h for the FP 13.