FlexQube Navigator AMR vs Open Shuttle Fork
FlexQube vs KNAPP — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- FlexQube Navigator AMR offers the higher payload (2,500 kg vs 1,500 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| FlexQube Navigator AMR | Open Shuttle Fork | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | FlexQube | KNAPP |
| Category | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Payload | 2,500 kg | 1,500 kg |
| Speed | — | 5.4 km/h |
| Battery Life | — | 480 min |
| Connectivity | ANT fleet management over the site network; standardized coupling carries power and data to the docked carrier | KiSoft FCS; VDA 5050 |
| Software / AI | BlueBotics ANT navigation and ANT fleet management | KiSoft FCS fleet control; VDA 5050 |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the FlexQube Navigator AMR and the Open Shuttle Fork?
FlexQube Navigator AMR is made by FlexQube, while Open Shuttle Fork is made by KNAPP. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FlexQube Navigator AMR or the Open Shuttle Fork?
The FlexQube Navigator AMR has the higher payload at 2,500 kg, compared to 1,500 kg for the Open Shuttle Fork.


