ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D vs FX250
Ecovacs Robotics 科沃斯机器人 vs Discovery Robotics — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D offers the faster top speed (4.32 km/h vs 2.09 km/h).
- FX250 offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 210 min).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D | FX250 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Ecovacs Robotics 科沃斯机器人 | Discovery Robotics |
| Category | Cleaning-Robots | Cleaning-Robots |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 126.5 kg | — |
| Speed | 4.32 km/h | 2.09 km/h |
| Battery Life | 210 min | 480 min |
| Charging Time | 2.5 hours | — |
| Software / AI | Autonomous navigation with 3D and 2D LiDAR fusion, smart path planning and smart re-cleaning; IoT elevator and access-control integration; app and cloud platform with visualised cleaning reports | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D and the FX250?
ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D is made by Ecovacs Robotics 科沃斯机器人, while FX250 is made by Discovery Robotics. Both are cleaning-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is faster, the ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D or the FX250?
The ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D has the higher top speed at 4.32 km/h, compared to 2.09 km/h for the FX250.
Which has the longer battery life, the ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D or the FX250?
The FX250 has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 210 minutes for the ECOVACS DEEBOT PRO M1 3D.