CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton vs ErigoPro
CETC Robotics / CUKTECH vs Hocoma — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- ErigoPro offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 70 min).
- CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton offers the lighter build (2.2 kg vs 300 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton | ErigoPro | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | CETC Robotics / CUKTECH | Hocoma |
| Category | Consumer-Robot | Exosuit |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | — | 2013 |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 300 kg |
| Speed | 18 km/h | — |
| Battery Life | 70 min | 360 min |
| Software / AI | Intelligent gait intention recognition algorithm driven by multi-modal sensing, providing adaptive assistance across flat ground, slopes and stairs | Graphical user interface with synchronised FES control |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton and the ErigoPro?
CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton is made by CETC Robotics / CUKTECH, while ErigoPro is made by Hocoma. CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton is a consumer-robot, while ErigoPro is a exosuit.
Which has the longer battery life, the CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton or the ErigoPro?
The ErigoPro has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 70 minutes for the CETC Baihong Explore Exoskeleton.