AspinaAMR300 vs FP 3
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs AFORMIC — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- FP 3 offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).
- AspinaAMR300 offers the lighter build (110 kg vs 200 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| AspinaAMR300 | FP 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | AFORMIC |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 110 kg | 200 kg |
| Payload | 300 kg | 300 kg |
| Speed | 3.6 km/h | 7.2 km/h |
| Battery Life | 600 min | Li-Ion 51 Ah, 48 V |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 8-ch I/O; PLC/API | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager |
| Software / AI | — | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR300 and the FP 3?
AspinaAMR300 is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while FP 3 is made by AFORMIC. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is faster, the AspinaAMR300 or the FP 3?
The FP 3 has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the AspinaAMR300.


