Armeo®Spring Pro vs SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series)
Hocoma vs Ottobock (SuitX) — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| Armeo®Spring Pro | SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series) | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Hocoma | Ottobock (SuitX) |
| Category | Exosuit | Exosuit |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Released: | 2023 | — |
| Weight | 1 kg | ~3 – 8 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 4 – 8 hours (powered versions) |
| Charging Time | — | ~2 hours (powered versions) |
| Connectivity | — | Bluetooth monitoring (some models) |
| Software / AI | Augmented Performance Feedback, VR exercises, ROM and workspace reporting | Ottobock/SuitX ergonomic monitoring tools |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the Armeo®Spring Pro and the SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series)?
Armeo®Spring Pro is made by Hocoma, while SUITX Exoskeletons (CX / IX Series) is made by Ottobock (SuitX). Both are exosuits, so the differences come down to price and specifications.