Magazino SOTO vs SMAR M3-P
Magazino vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
快速總結
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M3-P offers the faster top speed (3.6 km/h vs 1.5 km/h).
- Magazino SOTO offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 360 min).
- Magazino SOTO offers the lighter build (695 kg vs 800 kg).
規格對比
| Magazino SOTO | SMAR M3-P | |
|---|---|---|
| 公司 | Magazino | Polaris3D |
| 類別 | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| 價格： | 尚未公布 | 尚未公布 |
| 重量 | 695 kg | 800 kg |
| 負載 | 240 kg | 80 kg |
| 臂展 | 1.7 m | — |
| 速度 | 1.5 km/h | 3.6 km/h |
| 續航時間 | 480 min | 360 min |
| 連線方式 | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | — |
| 軟體 / AI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
選購指南與價格
常見問題
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the SMAR M3-P?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while SMAR M3-P is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-P?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M3-P.
Which is faster, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-P?
The SMAR M3-P has the higher top speed at 3.6 km/h, compared to 1.5 km/h for the Magazino SOTO.
Which has the longer battery life, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-P?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 360 minutes for the SMAR M3-P.