Magazino SOTO vs SMAR M3-P
Magazino vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
핵심 요약
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M3-P offers the faster top speed (3.6 km/h vs 1.5 km/h).
- Magazino SOTO offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 360 min).
- Magazino SOTO offers the lighter build (695 kg vs 800 kg).
사양 비교
| Magazino SOTO | SMAR M3-P | |
|---|---|---|
| 회사 | Magazino | Polaris3D |
| 카테고리 | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| 가격: | 미공개 | 미공개 |
| 무게 | 695 kg | 800 kg |
| 가반하중 | 240 kg | 80 kg |
| 도달거리 | 1.7 m | — |
| 속도 | 1.5 km/h | 3.6 km/h |
| 배터리 지속 시간 | 480 min | 360 min |
| 연결성 | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | — |
| 소프트웨어 / AI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
구매 가이드 및 가격
자주 묻는 질문
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the SMAR M3-P?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while SMAR M3-P is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-P?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M3-P.
Which is faster, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-P?
The SMAR M3-P has the higher top speed at 3.6 km/h, compared to 1.5 km/h for the Magazino SOTO.
Which has the longer battery life, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M3-P?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 360 minutes for the SMAR M3-P.