AspinaAMR100 vs SMAR M2QD
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
快速总结
- AspinaAMR100 offers the higher payload (100 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M2QD offers the longer runtime (600 min vs 480 min).
- SMAR M2QD offers the lighter build (30 kg vs 70 kg).
规格对比
| AspinaAMR100 | SMAR M2QD | |
|---|---|---|
| 公司 | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Polaris3D |
| 类别 | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| 价格： | 未公布 | 未公布 |
| 重量 | 70 kg | 30 kg |
| 负载 | 100 kg | 80 kg |
| 速度 | 3.6 km/h | 3.6 km/h |
| 续航时间 | 480 min | 600 min |
| 连接方式 | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 6-ch I/O; PLC/API | — |
选购指南与价格
常见问题
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR100 and the SMAR M2QD?
AspinaAMR100 is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while SMAR M2QD is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M2QD?
The AspinaAMR100 has the higher payload at 100 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M2QD.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M2QD?
The SMAR M2QD has the higher runtime at about 600 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the AspinaAMR100.