AspinaAMR100 vs SMAR M2QD
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- AspinaAMR100 offers the higher payload (100 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M2QD offers the longer runtime (600 min vs 480 min).
- SMAR M2QD offers the lighter build (30 kg vs 70 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR100 | SMAR M2QD | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 70 kg | 30 kg |
| Traglast | 100 kg | 80 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | 3.6 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 600 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 6-ch I/O; PLC/API | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR100 and the SMAR M2QD?
AspinaAMR100 is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while SMAR M2QD is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M2QD?
The AspinaAMR100 has the higher payload at 100 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M2QD.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M2QD?
The SMAR M2QD has the higher runtime at about 600 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the AspinaAMR100.